It's an uncomfortable question: Is it appropriate to enjoy art made by less than perfect people, or in some cases, absolutely heinous people? Michael Jackson's legacy changed as he grew older, but Phil Spector's reputation coincided with the art he was creating. Do we tacitly approve of their actions by listening, or not?
It's an uncomfortable question: Is it appropriate to enjoy art made by less than perfect people, or in some cases, absolutely heinous people? Michael Jackson's legacy changed as he grew older, but Phil Spector's reputation coincided with the art he was creating. Do we tacitly approve of their actions by listening, or not?